A Pedagogue's Progress
Monday, December 31, 2007
 
2007

I was back in school today for a staff meeting and got to say a few words, over cheese and a glass of wine, to our new Cambridge English graduate-principal about how to stop RGS girls from defecting to Hwa Chong Humanz (like she did way back when). Initial impressions of her are very positive: I just wonder if she has enough clout to keep me from the MOE's clutches come the end of 2009. Jamie and I then moaned about the poor quality of the Football Channel and John Burridge's bad dress sense. Found out that I'll be a CT next year -- though not of 08A01C, but (probably) a J1 Humanz class. This promises to be fascinating, though the workload is going to go through the roof. Thank goodness my lecture notes for Term 1 are all but done; their imminent completion will mark the first time ever that I've accomplished what I've set out to do in the holidays. I remember trying to do thesis research here in the spring and summer of 2003, and failing completely.

I haven't read that many books this year as the previous two years, unless you count the stuff I read for school (some of which, like the ones on economic development that I read over the past month, are ridiculously boring and arcane). I also haven't kept a list of readings; my notebook records only four, the last being Imagined Communities in June, and the others being John Lewis Gaddis's general history of the Cold War, his Landscape of History, and The Lost World. I've managed a couple since then, of course, the last two being Niall Ferguson's Empire and The Scarlet Letter (both of which I managed to take copious notes on). I also read The Last Days of the Renaissance, The Israel Lobby, God is Not Great, The Modern Researcher, Forgotten Wars, and 3/4 of Indonesian Destinies and The American University. I probably attempted half a dozen others but never really got stuck into them.

Next year, as usual, I will aim to finish more books than I buy, but I have already gotten off to a poor start by ordering In Command of History, The Declaration of Independence: A Global History, and The Wilsonian Moment. The last two, both written by Harvard History professors, ought to make for some fascinating comparisons. Right now, I can't see beyond Harvard for graduate school: Ferguson, Jasanoff, Manela, Armitage, and Meier are as formidable lineup as any.

Books aside, 2007 was the year that I got my first proper job. That's about it really. RJC is an amazing place to be, and I'm so glad I'm not going to be a career civil servant.


Comments:

About taking notes -- what's your system? One of my favourite writers is Clive James (whose prose, in the tradition of the truly great, only seems to get more energetic as he ages); and his latest book "Cultural Amnesia" is a pretty compelling endorsement of the note-taking habit. And wouldn't you just love to see Barzun's notes?

 
I'm afraid I don't have a system yet! Most of the time, I just open a new Word document and start typing. I have tried a programme called Scribe, which is essentially electronic note cards -- but it's mostly for large-scale research projects.

I also annotate books (underlining, marginal notes, stickies) which I think will be useful in the future.

 
Scribe looks robust. Have you heard of OneNote though? It's an inuitive electronic equivalent of the filing cabinet -- you can capture anything you see on the net (and even recordings you make, for example) onto OneNote for easy reference later; and unlike most of Microsoft's products to date, it's not stuffed with useless bells and whistles.

The only problem is, while OneNote does allow you to tag what you capture, its tagging capabilities are clearly limited; it works for the most part in a more traditional top-down folder-based way. So you can't, for example, make species and sub-species of tags for each project you take on, though you can do that for folders. Unfortunately most of the note-taking software out there suffer from the same problem. I haven't seen a programme that marries both approaches without -- crucially -- being too much of a hassle to use.

Annotating books: Aren't margins tiny? Then again I suppose it's a less labour-intensive way of taking notes if you don't know whether you'll have to engage more deeply with the book later. My note-taking efforts so far -- mostly on paper if the source's a book -- have been involved and time-consuming; I still haven't quite got the knack of summarizing concisely. So your no-fuss approach does sound appealing: though it'd mean that I'd quickly forget the book's contents.

 
Post a Comment